Home InternationalTombes de Qin Shi Huang : pourquoi les archéologues n’osent pas l’ouvrir

Tombes de Qin Shi Huang : pourquoi les archéologues n’osent pas l’ouvrir

Archaeologists Hesitate to Open Qin Shi Huang’s Tomb, Citing Potential Hazards and Preservation Concerns

Xi’an, China – For nearly five decades, the world has been captivated by the Terracotta Army, the silent legion guarding the tomb of Qin Shi Huang, China’s first emperor. Discovered in 1974 near Xi’an by local farmers, the site continues to yield archaeological treasures. Yet, the emperor’s actual mausoleum remains sealed, and for good reason, experts say. A combination of ancient warnings, modern scientific findings, and a commitment to preservation are keeping archaeologists from breaching the inner sanctum.

Qin Shi Huang, who unified China in 221 BC and died in 210 BC, envisioned an afterlife mirroring his earthly power. Historical texts, notably the Records of the Grand Historian compiled by Sima Qian, detail elaborate defenses designed to deter grave robbers – and anyone else. These accounts describe crossbows programmed to fire upon intruders and, perhaps more alarmingly, a network of rivers filled with mercury, replicating China’s major waterways.

Recent research lends credence to these ancient claims. A 2020 study published in Nature detected unusually high mercury levels in the soil surrounding the tomb mound. Ground-penetrating radar has further revealed the existence of extensive underground chambers, supporting descriptions of a vast “underground palace.”

“We found by a survey that the mercury density in Qinshihuang’s cemetery area is exceptionally higher than that in the area on the periphery,” explained archaeologist Duan Qingbo of the Shaanxi Provincial Archaeology Institute in a 2006 interview. While the functionality of the ancient traps after 2,200 years is debated, the potential for mercury volatilization – releasing toxic fumes if disturbed – is a serious concern.

Beyond the immediate dangers, preservation poses a significant challenge. The fate of the Terracotta Army itself serves as a cautionary tale. When first unearthed, the warriors’ vibrant pigments faded rapidly upon exposure to air. Archaeologists fear similar degradation could occur to any artifacts within the sealed tomb chamber.

“These cultural relics have been buried for more than 2,000 years in the grave and have achieved a state of equilibrium. If they are excavated improperly… they will quickly turn bad,” warned Zhang Bai, former deputy director of China’s State Administration of Cultural Heritage (SACH), at a 2005 conference.

SACH’s policies reflect this caution, strictly limiting excavations to situations involving immediate threats, such as natural disasters or looting. The agency prioritizes “protection first,” as outlined in China’s cultural heritage laws.

Currently, archaeological efforts are focused on the surrounding pits, which have already yielded over 8,000 unique figures – soldiers, chariots, and even a recently discovered royal tomb believed to belong to Prince Gao. These discoveries provide valuable insights without jeopardizing the integrity of the emperor’s mausoleum.

For now, Qin Shi Huang remains undisturbed, his underground palace a testament to both ancient ingenuity and modern archaeological restraint. Experts agree that waiting for advancements in preservation technology is the most responsible course of action. Opening the tomb prematurely, they say, would be an act of archaeological vandalism.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.