US Congressional Report on Nigeria Sparks Diplomatic Tensions, Concerns Over Sovereignty

ABUJA, Nigeria – A report from the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee and House Appropriations Committee alleging widespread Christian persecution in Nigeria has ignited a firestorm of controversy, prompting strong reactions from Nigerian religious leaders and government officials, and raising questions about the limits of foreign intervention in domestic affairs. The report, submitted to the White House on Monday, recommends a series of punitive measures against Nigeria, including the repeal of Sharia law in northern states and sanctions targeting the country’s cattle export industry.

The report paints a grim picture of religious violence, claiming Nigeria is “the deadliest place in the world to be a Christian,” citing attacks by Fulani militias and terrorist groups resulting in thousands of deaths, destroyed churches, and kidnappings. It further calls for the disarmament of Fulani herdsmen and the imposition of economic restrictions.

However, the recommendations have been met with fierce opposition from prominent Islamic clerics in Nigeria. Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, a Kaduna-based cleric, defended the application of Sharia law, arguing Muslims have a right to be governed by their religious tenets. “Shariah Law is the Muslims’ prerogative just as the US found it only necessary to protect the Christians,” he stated in a social media post. Gumi also alleges that Muslims are victims of “occult terror” operating within the country.

Other religious leaders echoed concerns about the report’s one-sided portrayal of the conflict. Sheikh Halliru Maraya, also based in Kaduna, cautioned against portraying the violence as solely targeting Christians. “Both Muslims and Christians are at the receiving end,” he said, adding that the perpetrators “kill everyone.” He stressed the importance of respecting Nigeria’s sovereignty and adhering to its laws in any potential intervention. Maraya cited figures indicating over 4,000 people were killed in Kaduna State between 2015 and 2023, with a significant number of victims from Muslim communities.

The controversy extends beyond religious circles. Dr. Hakeem Baba-Ahmed, a former spokesperson for the Northern Elders Forum, described the U.S. Congressional recommendations as “provocative,” warning of a dangerous escalation in the U.S.’s involvement in Nigeria. He expressed concern over existing agreements allowing U.S. troops to operate within Nigeria, questioning the true motivations behind the security cooperation.

“If reports…are true, then it is time to take the nature of our current relationship with the US more seriously,” Baba-Ahmed stated. He accused the U.S. of attempting to weaken Nigeria’s government and compromise its sovereignty.

Political scientist Prof. Jibrin Ibrahim similarly criticized the U.S. for a “simplistic” understanding of Nigeria’s complex security challenges. He argued that much of the violence stems from banditry and competition over resources, affecting all communities regardless of faith. He also pointed to what he perceives as a reluctance from the Tinubu administration to firmly assert Nigeria’s independence.

“The US has a right to express its concerns…But it is not for the US to determine Nigeria’s policy on security matters,” Ibrahim said.

The Nigerian federal government, however, has attempted to downplay the tensions, framing the report as a potential catalyst for broader cooperation. In a statement released Tuesday, Information and National Orientation Minister Mohammed Idris affirmed Nigeria’s commitment to its strategic partnership with the U.S. and reiterated the country’s dedication to protecting all its citizens, regardless of faith.

“We remain open to constructive dialogue and cooperation rooted in mutual respect, shared responsibility, and recognition of Nigeria’s constitutional framework and sovereignty,” Idris stated. He emphasized that Nigeria does not have a state policy of religious persecution and that ongoing security operations are aimed at addressing complex threats, not religious bias.

The U.S. recommendations come at a sensitive time, as Nigeria grapples with escalating insecurity across multiple fronts. According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), Nigeria experienced a significant increase in security incidents in 2023, with over 8,000 reported fatalities linked to conflict. While the report focuses on attacks attributed to Fulani militias and Islamist groups, broader issues of poverty, climate change, and weak governance contribute to the volatile security landscape.

Ambassador Ibrahim Kawu, a former Nigerian ambassador to the United Nations, criticized what he described as the U.S.’s disregard for Nigeria’s sovereignty, attributing it to Abuja’s perceived lack of assertiveness in international forums.

The situation underscores the delicate balance between international concern for human rights and the principle of national sovereignty. As Nigeria navigates its internal challenges, the response to the U.S. Congressional report will likely shape its future relationship with Washington and its standing on the global stage.